ROBERT FRANK. NEW JERSEY 1955-1956
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
On the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the publication of The Americans, the National Gallery of Art will organize an exhibition of Robert Frank at Washington, San Francisco and New York in 2009. Speaking of this important show, responsibles for the National Gallery described the Robert Frank work as the single most important book of photographs published since the Second World War. And in a recent article, published this month in The New York Times by Philip Gefter, entitled Snapshots from the American road, emphasizes:”No one has had a greater influence on photography in the last half-century that the Swis-born Mr.Frank, though his reputation rests almost entirely on a single book published five decades ago.” In the Spanish recent reissue by La Fábrica, they went even further and described the book as "the work summit in the history of photography." Despite my admiration for the photography of Robert Frank, I have serious doubts about this assertion.
The Americans was published in France, by Delpire, in 1958 and in America in 1959, but before that, in 1952 in Paris and 1954 in New York, Henri Cartier-Bresson had already published his The Decisive Moment. Aside from the importance of the creation of the Magnum Photo Agency, Cartier-Bresson brought a new style of photography based on the new 35-mm rangefinder cameras, as Leica, and his theory of The Decisive Moment is still in force today. I agree that the principles of the French photographer could not remain immutable forever, but, don’t the images of Frank, that I show here, remember quitte a lot to the ones Henri Cartier-Bresson took a few years earlier?
ROBERT FRANK. CHICAGO 1955-1956
CARTIER-BRESSON. NEW YORK 1947
ROBERT FRANK. INDIANAPOLIS 1955-1956
CARTIER-BRESSON. LOS ANGELES 1946
ROBERT FRANK. LONDON1952
CARTIER-BRESSON. NEW YORK 1947
And as someone who does shatter the style of the founder of Magnum, I would distinguish William Klein and his New York book published in France in 1956, 2 years before than the one of Robert Frank.
3 opmerkingen:
I think it is difficult to choose a best of something, and even more for a photo book. I unfortunately never had in my hands "sweet life" so can't say anything about it. But for me the biggest difference between "the decisive moment", "New York" and "The Americans" is that the later has a "political" approach and destabilize the viewer by the point of view and the ideas more than just the photography. So I do not think comparing power of photographs is a good way to do it as we are talking about a book so it's a group of pictures. (We have in the case of Eugene Smith to say, as great photographer he was, that his pictures are often set up ("Tomoko in the bath" was)and so not comparable to Frank's pictures)
Surely "New York" has a much greater graphical impact, and sure "the decisive moment" gave birth to a long lasting perception of photography and have a beautiful poetic vision, but "the Americans" shacked the American Way of life...
Which one of the 3 is best? I'll not take the responsibility to respond to that question.
I think it is difficult to choose a best of something, and even more for a photo book. I unfortunately never had in my hands "sweet life" so can't say anything about it. But for me the biggest difference between "the decisive moment", "New York" and "The Americans" is that the later has a "political" approach and destabilize the viewer by the point of view and the ideas more than just the photography. So I do not think comparing power of photographs is a good way to do it as we are talking about a book so it's a group of pictures. (We have in the case of Eugene Smith to say, as great photographer he was, that his pictures are often set up ("Tomoko in the bath" was)and so not comparable to Frank's pictures)
Surely "New York" has a much greater graphical impact, and sure "the decisive moment" gave birth to a long lasting perception of photography and have a beautiful poetic vision, but "the Americans" shacked the American Way of life...
Which one of the 3 is best? I'll not take the responsibility to respond to that question.
Congratulations on a well reasoned argument. If I had to choose between Frank and Klein, I'd go for Frank every time. Frank is an observer and recorder while Klein is a participant and provocateur. Klein photographs dramas of his own making, his own interventions are critical. Frank employs intense powers of observation to record what others would never see. What would Walker Evans have said? Evans assisted Frank with his Guggenheim application - I don't think he'd have been impressed by Klein's bombast and rhetoric.
Een reactie posten